Glyd

What runs on a 96 GB GPU, exactly

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 and GH200. Open models in their original precision, no quantization, with and without Glyd.

Speed

Verified bit for bit, and timed against bf16 in the same run, on the RTX 4090, RTX 5090, H100 SXM, H100 PCIe, A100, A10, A10G, RTX PRO 6000 and RTX 4080 SUPER.

See the benchmarks

Runs only with Glyd

bf16 does not fit; Glyd does, bit for bit
Needs, GBRoom for context, K tokens
Modelbf16GlydGlyd
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct145.499.019
Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct149.7102.110

Runs either way

Glyd leaves room for a longer context or more users
Needs, GBRoom for context, K tokens
Modelbf16Glydbf16Glyd
Qwen3.5-2Best.6.34.87,8527,973
SmolLM3-3B8.46.31,2871,314
Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct9.06.9825843
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16est.9.77.15,6815,841
Qwen3-4B-Instruct-250710.98.3631648
Qwen3.5-4Best.11.28.12,7992,892
gemma-4-E2B-itest.11.98.612,66513,134
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.317.212.4660696
gemma-4-E4B-itest.17.812.55,9326,296
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct18.713.5648688
Qwen3-8B19.214.0574610
MiMo-V2.6-Distill-Qwen-9Best.20.714.52,5092,697
Qwen3.5-9B21.215.72,4942,660
gemma-4-12B-itest.26.418.61,1771,296
gemma-3-12b-it26.918.81,1701,292
phi-432.623.0350397
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B32.823.3364412
Mistral-Small-3.2-24B-Instruct-250651.035.1324420
gemma-4-26B-A4B-it53.836.81,2071,620
gemma-3-27b-it57.639.6564783
Qwen3.8-27B57.739.5694972
Qwen3.5-27Best.57.739.5694971
Qwen3.6-27Best.57.739.5694971
Muse-Glimmer-30B61.441.83,1164,583
Qwen3-30B-A3B63.543.5407610
gemma-4-31B-itest.66.345.9235360
Qwen3-32B69.348.3136216
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16est.67.546.05,7299,232
Qwen3.5-35B-A3Best.73.750.21,4222,570
Qwen3.6-35B-A3Best.73.750.21,4222,570

Too big for 96 GB

Even compressed
Needs, GB
Modelbf16GlydFits on
Qwen3-Coder-Nextest.161.2109.1141 GB
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct164.5112.1141 GB
Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct220.5149.0141 GB
GLM-4.5-Air224.1151.22 H100s

Speed on this GPU

RTX PRO 6000, Qwen3-8B, 12-bit layout, v0.22.0: GPU time a step after the prompt; lower is better. log

GPU time a step, ms
Sequences a stepbf16GlydChange, %
113.4011.29−16
814.0312.18−13
3215.3113.86−9
6416.3216.77+3
12818.4418.84+2
Every GPU tested, release by release

Questions about 96 GB GPUs

Which models run on a 96 GB GPU only with Glyd?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct. With an 8K-token context they need 145.4 to 149.7 GB in bf16, more than one 96 GB GPU holds, and 99 to 102.1 GB with Glyd, every weight exact.

Is it slower than bf16?

Usually not, at a few sequences a step: the table on this page gives v0.22.0's numbers. At many sequences, and for long prompts on some GPUs, Glyd still takes longer (the known gaps on the benchmarks page).

How is this different from a 4-bit GGUF?

A 4-bit model is smaller, 4 bits a weight and their scales, but its weights are rounded and its answers change. Glyd gives you the original model.

Updated Oct 5, 2026. A model fits when its weights, an 8K-token KV cache and 1.5 GB for the runtime fit in the memory nvidia-smi reports: 97,887 MiB on a 96 GB card.