Glyd

What runs on a 80 GB GPU, exactly

NVIDIA H100 and A100 80 GB. Open models in their original precision, no quantization, with and without Glyd.

Measured on an H100 SXM
Weights, GiBbf16Glyd
Qwen3.8-27B50.2238.77
The measurements

Runs only with Glyd

bf16 does not fit; Glyd does, bit for bit

None of the models we track.

Runs either way

Glyd leaves room for a longer context or more users
Needs, GBRoom for context, K tokens
Modelbf16Glydbf16Glyd
Qwen3.5-2Best.6.34.86,4586,580
SmolLM3-3B8.46.31,0551,082
Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct9.06.9676694
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16est.9.77.14,6364,796
Qwen3-4B-Instruct-250710.98.3515532
Qwen3.5-4Best.11.28.12,2762,370
gemma-4-E2B-itest.11.98.610,27610,745
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.317.212.4530566
gemma-4-E4B-itest.17.812.54,7385,102
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct18.713.5518558
Qwen3-8B19.214.0458493
MiMo-V2.6-Distill-Qwen-9Best.20.714.51,9862,174
Qwen3.5-9B21.215.71,9712,138
gemma-4-12B-itest.26.418.69151,035
gemma-3-12b-it26.918.89091,031
phi-432.623.0267314
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B32.823.3277324
Mistral-Small-3.2-24B-Instruct-250651.035.1219316
gemma-4-26B-A4B-it53.836.87891,202
gemma-3-27b-it57.639.6355574
Qwen3.8-27B57.739.5433711
Qwen3.5-27Best.57.739.5433710
Qwen3.6-27Best.57.739.5433710
Muse-Glimmer-30B61.441.81,8303,297
Qwen3-30B-A3B63.543.5232435
gemma-4-31B-itest.66.345.9130255
Qwen3-32B69.348.370150
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16est.67.546.02,9436,445
Qwen3.5-35B-A3Best.73.750.25861,734
Qwen3.6-35B-A3Best.73.750.25861,734

Too big for 80 GB

Even compressed
Needs, GB
Modelbf16GlydFits on
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct145.499.096 GB
Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct149.7102.196 GB
Qwen3-Coder-Nextest.161.2109.1141 GB
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct164.5112.1141 GB

Speed on this GPU

H100 PCIe, Qwen3-8B, 12-bit layout, v0.22.0: GPU time a step after the prompt; lower is better. log

GPU time a step, ms
Sequences a stepbf16GlydChange, %
112.0811.08−8
813.1112.34−6
3214.2613.53−5
6415.1914.77−3
12817.2917.94+4
Every GPU tested, release by release

Questions about 80 GB GPUs

Which models run on a 80 GB GPU only with Glyd?

None of the models we track: every one that fits with Glyd fits in bf16 too, and Glyd leaves the difference for a longer context.

Is it slower than bf16?

Usually not, at a few sequences a step: the table on this page gives v0.22.0's numbers. At many sequences, and for long prompts on some GPUs, Glyd still takes longer (the known gaps on the benchmarks page).

Has Glyd been measured on a 80 GB GPU with a 2026 model?

Yes: Qwen3.8-27B's weights took 38.77 GiB with Glyd on an H100 SXM against bf16's 50.22 (vLLM 0.30.0, v0.28.0). The KV cache held 204,117 tokens against bf16's 122,538 (1.67 times).

How is this different from a 4-bit GGUF?

A 4-bit model is smaller, 4 bits a weight and their scales, but its weights are rounded and its answers change. Glyd gives you the original model.

Updated Oct 5, 2026. A model fits when its weights, an 8K-token KV cache and 1.5 GB for the runtime fit in the memory nvidia-smi reports: 81,559 MiB on a 80 GB card.